It’s important to remember that SVB is not your typical bank. While most banks loan out deposits, thereby benefiting from rising interest rates, SVB invested its customers’ deposits in long-dated US government bonds. As interest rates rose, the value of these bonds fell, leading to SVB announcing a $1.75bn capital raise. Unsurprisingly, this spooked its heavily-tech-sector clients, leading to a run on the bank. So, are we facing a systemic banking crisis like the one we saw in 2008? Probably not.
Nevertheless, this jolt to the financial sector has put markets in a risk-off mode (investors buying safe bonds while selling risky bonds and equities), which was compounded by the recent sale of Credit Suisse to UBS. In this kind of environment, what we think works is: owning more safe bonds and less equities than normal; having exposure to areas relatively insulated from the cause of these banking-sector stresses, such as Asia; owning low-volatility stocks; owning gold; having less exposure to emerging market and high-yield bonds, and to equity markets with a large bank weight such as the eurozone.
This is broadly how our flagship portfolios are positioned. And it’s also a reminder of why time in the market is more important than timing the market. We strive to remain invested (although tilting portfolios depending on our house view), and investing selectively while remaining true to one’s medium-term strategy is key. While we believe now is not the time to add equity risk to portfolios, we think investing with a quality bias means we can ensure the risk taken within portfolios is the right type of risk. Events such as SVB’s crisis demonstrate why long-term quality matters.
Daniele Antonucci, Chief Economist & Macro Strategist
Both current output and new orders improved significantly, while employment in both services and manufacturing crossed the 50-threshold, separating expansions from recessions, suggesting that a consumption-driven recovery has room to run.
We expect growth in China to recover meaningfully in the coming months, with domestic strength outweighing a slowdown in activity elsewhere.
Source: In-house research, Refinitiv;
note: values > 50 = expansion; < 50 = contraction.
What’s happening?
Global recession fears have receded slightly, with persistently strong US economic data, lower natural gas prices (for Europe) and China’s reopening. Headline inflation marked a peak in mid-2022 but the peak in core inflation is less pronounced in the US/UK as services inflation remains hot. More notably, the data shows that core inflation has not peaked just yet in the eurozone.
Before the US Congress in early March, Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Powell turned hawkish again. This was an unexpectedly aggressive posture following the most recent step down in the pace of rate rises. The outlook for the European Central Bank (ECB) is also more uncertain, with risks of a higher terminal rate. Yield curves remain inverted (short-term interest rates remain higher than long-term ones), a sign that investors are concerned about growth.
This is where the dilemma surrounding the recent banking sector stresses and bouts of financial instability comes in. There were questions as to whether central banks would stay the course in their battle against inflation or pause hikes to ease pressure on the US and European banking sectors. Both the Fed and ECB stuck to their guns and raised rates in line with previous guidance (25 and 50 bps, respectively) signalling that they view inflation as the more dangerous factor at play for the US and European economies. That said, the Fed also signalled that it is close to pausing its hiking cycle.
Turning East, China will continue to support its economy without resorting to large-scale stimulus. Beijing set a conservative ~5% growth target, accounting for external headwinds.
What we’re watching
While one might usually expect resilient economic data to support stocks, February’s data led to a decline in developed market (DM) equities, as investors reassessed their expectations for both the peak in inflation and subsequent interest rate movements.
It appeared that too much optimism was priced in DM equity prices. With the Fed and ECB staying hawkish, we expect more downside risk to be priced in, as potential further rate rises would imply higher discount rates and slower growth. That said, the recent market volatility makes central banks’ trajectories more uncertain as it’s not obvious that they may continue to hike at a fast pace.
We anticipate 2023 to be a year of growth divergence, with China and Asia overall serving as growth hotspots in contrast to developed markets. Despite a recent market drop caused by geopolitical tensions, the ongoing economic reopening in China is an important source of optimism for investors in the near to medium term.
With headline inflation falling (US) or tentatively peaking (Europe), several central banks are pivoting towards smaller rate rises, to eventually stop hiking over the next few months
At risk of sounding like a broken record, we want to reiterate that we believe “bonds are back” and this is reflected in our recent changes in flagship portfolios. We have further reduced our exposure to emerging market (EM) credit and replaced this with safe developed market government bonds – a change that reduces the interest rate sensitivity of our portfolios. These changes mean our overall credit exposure has now reduced to a level lower than our typical long-term allocation. This month we also reduced our exposure to hard currency (USD) EM sovereign bonds. Instead, we have allocated to short-dated DM government bonds as yields are attractive.
Our equity allocations remain slightly lower than normal – we remain somewhat underweight. However, we reshuffled within equities by reducing our US and overall EM equities in favour for Asia-Pacific equities including Japan. This move gives us a more direct exposure to the reopening of China and the continued positive growth momentum across the region.
With inflation uncertainty lingering in Europe, we are still cautious on eurozone equities, despite their strong performance of late (prior to the latest bout of financial instability). We await more certainty on inflation trends and future growth before adding exposure to this cyclical market. The recent stresses in the banking system add an extra layer of uncertainty.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Faster move past inflation/
Fed/bond yields peak
↓
Increase equity/fixed income
Russia/Ukraine
negotiations/end of war
↓
Increase EU equities/high-yield bonds
China reopening
without major problems
↓
Increase EM/China risk exposure
Central banks overtighten
even if inflation slows
↓
Reduce risk in equities & bonds,
add gold
Russia/Ukraine war
gets worse
↓
Reduce European risk exposure,
add gold
China/Taiwan/US
escalation
↓
Reduce EM/Asia
risk exposure
European gas crisis
deteriorates again
↓
Reduce EU & UK
equities/high-yield bonds
Wage-price spiral
pushing inflation higher
↓
Reduce bond exposure,
diversify further
Systemic banking crisis/
financial instability
↓
Increase safe bond exposure,
add gold
The information contained in this article is defined as non-independent research because it has not been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, including any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of this information.
This article contains general information only and is not intended to constitute financial or other professional advice or a recommendation that any recipient of this information should make any particular investment decision. Always consult a suitably qualified financial advisor on any specific financial matter or problem that you have.
Except insofar as liability under any statute cannot be excluded, neither Brown Shipley nor any employee or associate of them accepts any liability (whether arising in contract, tort, negligence or otherwise) for any error or omission in this article or for any resulting loss or damage whether direct, indirect, consequential or otherwise suffered by the recipient of this article.
Investing in stocks either directly or indirectly carries investment risk. The value of equity based investments may go down as well as up over time due to factors such as, market volatility, interest rates, and general economic conditions.
Information correct as at 27 March 2023.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns
© Brown Shipley 2023 reproduction strictly prohibited.