All eyes are on Europe this summer. It’s one of the most visited regions, time and again, by tourists from all around the globe. The European Football Championship also kicked off last week in Germany, the Summer Olympics in Paris starts next month and, for those more politically minded, we just had the European elections and there are key national elections in France and the UK on the horizon (and, Europe aside, the all-important US election in November).
In our 2024 Investment Outlook, I talked about this being a year of two halves. Slowing growth and easing inflation in the first half, followed by mid-year rate cuts and a gradual recovery in the second half of the year. That’s just what happened in Europe, although growth didn’t slow to the recessionary levels we initially envisioned. I also spoke about an asynchronous interest rate-cutting cycle in the West, with the US Federal Reserve (Fed) leading the way as inflation was moderating more markedly in 2023. However, US growth has been surprisingly resilient (though beginning to slow more recently), causing inflation to be slightly stickier than expected. The asynchronous rate-cutting cycle has started, but it’s the European Central Bank (ECB) leading the way, with the Fed lagging and the Bank of England (BoE) somewhere in the middle.
What did this all mean for portfolios? Active portfolio management is one of the core pillars of our investment philosophy. So, when the market environment changes, we adapt. We thought there was a high probability that Europe would go into recession but also that, as inflation slowed, interest rate cuts would remove a significant headwind to markets. This is why we moderated our defensive positioning in portfolios back in December 2023 and bought slightly more equities. Inflation did slow, but growth stayed resilient. So, we thought the outlook for equities was likely to improve. This led us to buy even more equities to a point where we now own slightly more compared to our long-term strategic allocation (we’re ‘overweight’ equities).
-Daniele-Antonucci-Chief-Investment-Officer-Quintet.jpg?width=650&height=650&ext=.jpg)
This brings us to our Mid-Year Outlook. Just because we’ve reached the middle of the year, it’s no reason to rip everything up and start again with a new view. Instead, we simply adapt to today’s market environment, attempting to anticipate what may come next. We see a continuation of our 2024 Investment Outlook: interest rate cuts remove a headwind for growth, and the economic outlook improves.
We expect three key trends:
In our May Counterpoint, we said that we sold European bonds and bought European equities given the forthcoming economic improvement we saw and relatively attractive European equity valuations. This investment meant that we turned slightly ‘overweight’ equities (owning more compared to our long-term strategic asset allocation), though not yet for Europe, where we still remain somewhat underweight.
Fundamentally, the case for adding exposure to this region is growing, for quite a few reasons:
So, given our view that there’s a higher probability of a recovery than a recession in Europe, adding to European equities would be a logical next step. Why not now, then? Because we think uncertainty prior to the French election is likely to increase. Therefore, even though the fundamental case for Europe looks more compelling to us than it was a few months ago, we maintain our somewhat reduced exposure at this stage. We will look for opportunities once the uncertainty clears and we get greater clarity on the European policy outlook.
Elsewhere in equities, back in February, we added a position in global small-cap equities as we believed equities had a more balanced risk-reward at the time, given the lower probability of recession in the US. Global small caps have performed well since then, and valuations remain attractive. At the same time, we’re looking at the timing of Fed rate cuts and the US economic outlook, which are important drivers for this asset class.
In fixed income, while valuations for European investment grade bonds have become somewhat more demanding, our exposure to this asset class remains higher vs our long-term allocation. This is because we like the yield these bonds offer. The ECB rate-cutting cycle in an improving economy could be supportive, too. Conversely, high-yield bonds are still pricing in a better economic backdrop than our base case, so we’re keeping a reduced exposure.
We’re also maintaining the ‘insurance’ we purchased earlier this year in our flagship portfolios and those where client knowledge and experience, and regulations, permit. This is an instrument that, under certain conditions, appreciates in value if there is an equity drawdown relative the purchase level, partially offsetting any negative performance (the value of the instrument goes up as the value of our equity portfolio goes down). To be clear, we’re not expecting an equity drawdown. However, there are lingering risks to equity markets, including potential volatility associated with the US election in November and any bouts of unexpected geopolitical concerns. Think of this like any other insurance: you don’t think your house is going to fall down, but you buy insurance just in case as it’s inexpensive relative to the cost of rebuilding your house.
This strategy, along with our underweight on European equities, could also help if European political events were to cause significant market volatility. While the fundamental case for Europe is stronger, the increase in political uncertainty suggests that investors shouldn’t be complacent at this stage. The European and French elections, depending on their ramifications, could potentially have a near-term knock-on effect on investor sentiment and, perhaps more importantly, long-term effects that are relevant for markets. This could include a lesser commitment to certain environmental sustainability and European integration and fiscal themes such issuing again ‘Eurobonds’ backed by all countries, less fiscal prudence in some countries, or even a less coordinated response to geopolitical challenges.
Earlier in this piece, I spoke about active management being a key pillar in our investment philosophy. However, investing isn’t all about implementing tactical tweaks. The bulk of portfolio returns are generated by the so-called strategic asset allocation – the long-term anchor from which you make your tactical tweaks. This is the foundation of our globally-diversified, multi-asset portfolio, which holds the QMM Fund Range that our parent company Quintet co-created with BlackRock, a variety of other funds, our global direct equity and sovereign bond portfolios, commodities and cash.
The point I’m making here is that, while we believe our tactical tilts will benefit portfolio performance, they will likely be a smaller contributor to performance than our strategic asset allocation. To put this into perspective, since the start of the year, our strategic asset allocation has delivered almost all the positive performance in our flagship portfolios, which is often the case. The single greatest exposure in our strategic asset allocation is US equities, reflecting longer-term megatrends in areas such as artificial intelligence, and the overall quality and growth of that market.
Some of our tactical positions earlier this year have aimed to protect portfolios against the heightened volatility that might possibly come from geopolitical events and elections. Put very simplistically (and to squeeze in another football reference here), in 2024, think of the strategic asset allocation as your attacking players and the tactical tweaks as your goalkeeper and defenders. That’s not the case all the time. Sometimes your defenders will charge up the pitch and score goals themselves.
Regardless of the interaction of the different parts of our portfolios, we stay true to our aim of protecting and growing our clients’ wealth. While we now own slightly more equities than bonds relative to our long-term allocation, we retain a mix of positions that help mitigate downside risks (should they materialise). Plus, we think our approach of global diversification, of ‘not putting all eggs in one basket’, reduces volatility and delivers more resilient outcomes. By spreading investments across multiple regions and asset classes, which are driven by different risk and return factors, we aim to mitigate the impact of local events including geopolitics and elections.
Important Information
Information correct as of 17 June 2024.
This document is designed as marketing material. This document has been composed by Brown Shipley & Co Ltd ("Brown Shipley”). Brown Shipley is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Registered in England and Wales No. 398426. Registered Office: 2 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AG.
This document is for information purposes only, does not constitute individual (investment or tax) advice and investment decisions must not be based merely on this document. Whenever this document mentions a product, service or advice, it should be considered only as an indication or summary and cannot be seen as complete or fully accurate. All (investment or tax) decisions based on this information are for your own expense and for your own risk. You should (have) assess(ed) whether the product or service is suitable for your situation. Brown Shipley and its employees cannot be held liable for any loss or damage arising out of the use of (any part of) this document.
The contents of this document are based on publicly available information and/or sources which we deem trustworthy. Although reasonable care has been employed to publish data and information as truthfully and correctly as possible, we cannot accept any liability for the contents of this document, as far as it is based on those sources.
Investing involves risks and the value of investments may go up or down. Past performance is no indication of future performance. Currency fluctuations may influence your returns.
The information included is subject to change and Brown Shipley has no obligation after the date of publication of the text to update or amend the information accordingly. Accordingly, this material may have already been updated, modified, amended and/or supplemented by the time you receive or access it.
This is non-independent research and it has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and that it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
All copyrights and trademarks regarding this document are held by Brown Shipley, unless expressly stated otherwise. You are not allowed to copy, duplicate in any form or redistribute or use in any way the contents of this document, completely or partially, without the prior explicit and written approval of Brown Shipley. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, and except as required to enable compliance with applicable securities law. See the privacy notice on our website for how your personal data is used (https://brownshipley.com/en-gb/privacy-and-cookie-policy).
© Brown Shipley 2024
