This note contains an overview of our market views, what we are watching, and our portfolio strategy. Any reference to portfolio positioning relates to our Flagship Solution. Clients with bespoke discretionary or advisory portfolios should consult their Client Advisor for the latest update on your portfolio.
US | The inflation/growth trade-off
Today has some uncomfortable echoes of the 1970s. Back then, the 1973 Arab oil embargo and the 1979 Iranian Revolution sent energy prices soaring and pushed the US into stagflation. Growth stalled, inflation ran hot and the US Federal Reserve (Fed) struggled to get control of it. Arthur Burns, who chaired the Fed at the time, was widely seen as yielding to political pressure from President Nixon to keep interest rates low, with damaging consequences.
Fast forward to today. The incoming Fed chair, likely Kevin Warsh pending Senate confirmation, faces a similar situation. President Trump is pushing hard for lower policy rates, while higher energy prices are again adding to inflationary pressures. Warsh has publicly stressed the Fed’s independence, but the real test will come from how he balances the central bank’s dual mandate: maximum employment and price stability.
Starting with inflation. Forward-looking indicators suggest price pressures could tick higher in the coming months, due to higher energy prices. The longer energy stays expensive, the more those costs filter through to other sectors, which could make inflation harder to control. At the same time, higher energy costs act like a tax on the economy. They slow activity and eventually dampen inflation through weaker growth.
That leads to the second point: growth. Energy prices staying higher for longer is a headwind for overall growth, including job creation. Still, the US is starting from a position of strength. Going into the current geopolitical tensions, the economy was in a phase of economic exceptionalism. Recent data back that up. Retail sales in March have held up even as gasoline prices climbed. April purchasing managers’ indices (PMIs) raised odds that the economy’s resilience was holding up into the second quarter of this year. Investment tied to AI and government support, including tax cuts, continues to support the economy.
Today’s inflation pressure is largely a supply-side shock, caused by the oil disruptions in the Middle East, which is difficult to fix with interest rates alone. Hiking rates does not produce more oil or cheaper energy. And lowering them while growth remains resilient would immediately raise questions about whether the Fed is acting independently or bending to political demands.
Altogether, we think the Fed may deliver a quarter of a percentage point cut towards the end of 2026, though the precise timing remains uncertain. AI-driven productivity gains may ease inflation over time, while high energy prices could weigh on growth, which might ease inflationary pressures further down the line. But that is probably as far as the Fed can go. Deeper or faster cuts would risk seeing history repeating itself: being too accommodating and letting inflation regain momentum. Against the backdrop of large and widening fiscal deficits, this underpins our underweight position in US Treasuries.
Geopolitics | Why markets were at a standstill
The US, Israel, Iran and Lebanon have all agreed to a temporary ceasefire. Yet markets stayed cautious. The reason is simple: underlying tensions between the US and Iran have not fundamentally eased and the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively shut.
With oil prices pushing above USD 100 per barrel at the time of writing, risk assets were on a slightly weaker footing than the previous week, despite a fairly solid earnings season so far. Higher oil prices also pushed government bond yields higher across almost all the major markets.
One area stood apart. Semiconductor stocks continued to rally. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index continued to rise into unchartered territory, and the Nasdaq rose as well. The driver was guidance from large technology companies that came in well above expectations. Intel was a clear example, with sales projections that surprised to the upside.
We still think the AI-driven rally has further room to run, which is one of the reasons why we remain invested in US equities. At the same time, we are mindful of the risks and hold a moderate overall equity overweight. Announced job cuts, such as those from Meta, suggest some firms are trying to offset surging capital expenditure.
This week | Central bank in focus
Japan’s latest inflation data showed prices still moving higher. Despite this backdrop, we expect the Bank of Japan to keep interest rates unchanged (Tuesday), given ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, while signalling that future rate increases are possible and, we think, rather likely.
The Fed (Wednesday) is also likely hold policy rates and is unlikely to commit to a clear path in what will be the last meeting chaired by Jerome Powell. First-quarter economic growth (Thursday) should show a bounceback, partly driven by a rebound in government Expenditure post government shutdown in the final quarter of last year.
Europe tells a different story. The latest PMI surveys point to clear weakness across the region. The Eurozone composite PMI, a key gauge of economic activity, fell below the 50 level, which marks the line between expansion and contraction. That move reinforces concerns that Europe is facing a classic stagflationary shock, with energy prices pushing costs higher as activity slows. Price components in the surveys are now rising at their fastest pace in three years.
First-quarter economic growth figures and April inflation numbers will be closely watched before the European Central Bank (ECB) meets on Thursday. The ECB is expected to keep rates unchanged for now. Recent comments from policymakers suggest they want more evidence before deciding whether rates need to rise. We think an increase before year-end is still possible, but it will depend on whether inflation proves sticky even as growth weakens.
In the UK, the Bank of England is also likely to stay on hold at its meeting on Thursday. However, the odds of an increase in the Bank rate are somewhat higher than in continental Europe, as the UK PMIs were higher than expected and showed a clear improvement that contrasted with the softer trend seen across the euro area.
If there is any content / terms in this article you are not familiar with, please take a look at our Glossary.

Important Information
Information correct as of 27 April 2026.
This document is designed as marketing material. This document has been composed by Brown Shipley & Co Ltd ("Brown Shipley”). Brown Shipley is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Registered in England and Wales No. 398426. Registered Office: 2 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AG.
This document is for information purposes only, does not constitute individual (investment or tax) advice and investment decisions must not be based merely on this document. Whenever this document mentions a product, service or advice, it should be considered only as an indication or summary and cannot be seen as complete or fully accurate. All (investment or tax) decisions based on this information are at your own expense and at your own risk. You should (have) assess(ed) whether the product or service is suitable for your situation. Brown Shipley and its employees cannot be held liable for any loss or damage arising out of the use of (any part of) this document.
The contents of this document are based on publicly available information and/or sources which we deem trustworthy. Although reasonable care has been employed to publish data and information as truthfully and correctly as possible, we cannot accept any liability for the contents of this document, as far as it is based on those sources.
Investing involves risks and the value of investments may go up or down. Past performance is no indication of future performance. Currency fluctuations may influence your returns.
The information included is subject to change and Brown Shipley has no obligation after the date of publication of the text to update or amend the information accordingly. Accordingly, this material may have already been updated, modified, amended and/or supplemented by the time you receive or access it.
This is non-independent research, and it has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.
All copyrights and trademarks regarding this document are held by Brown Shipley, unless expressly stated otherwise. You are not allowed to copy, duplicate in any form or redistribute or use in any way the contents of this document, completely or partially, without the prior explicit and written approval of Brown Shipley. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, and except as required to enable compliance with applicable securities law. See the privacy notice on our website for how your personal data is used (https://brownshipley.com/en-gb/privacy-and-cookie-policy).
© Brown Shipley 2026

